Who we are
We believe politics is a decision problem, and that decisions can be computed. Boost Europe Club is the first party for the century of technology. Our program is a set of forecasting, computational and AI models, with transparent assumptions, measurable accountability and member influence based on prediction quality. We start with 100 people who settle the principles.
The problem
Parties were built for daily newspapers, local branches and delegate conferences. Decisions come from gut feeling, polling and back rooms. Whoever rises has waited, not been right. The program is a text you cannot recompute. The books come a year later.
Voters deserve better.
943,000 → 394,000
SPD members in 1990 and 2021. The CDU went from 790,000 to 384,000. Not a blip, a thirty-year trend.
Source: bpb, party membership series.
77 % vs. 17 %
consider parties necessary, are satisfied with how they work. Sixty points between the idea and the offer. We read that as demand.
−0.3 % → −0.2 %
Real GDP 2023 and 2024, first estimate. Two years of contraction in a row. No party program says where the next decade of growth comes from.
95 % → <80 %
EU productivity relative to the US, 1995 and today. Meanwhile what AI agents do on their own doubles every three months. Whoever plans in legislative periods loses against that curve.
Sources: Draghi report, Part A, 2024 · METR, 2026.
The approach v0.1 · 4 principles · 0 positions
Positions come out of a model anyone can check, not out of a back room. Four things are settled. The 100 founding mothers & fathers of our party decide the principles by which Boost Europe Club works.
Every assumption is in it, with its source. A position is what comes out when you run the numbers.
Whoever wants a say in an area is measured by how good their predictions there are. Continuously, not every four years.
Statute, models, scoring code, books. The only exception is personal data.
Anyone may report a flaw, membership or not. We are the only party that measurably improves through criticism.
We are still settling how prediction quality is measured, how much weight follows from it, who confirms a flaw and which topics come first. The 100 founding mothers & fathers do that at the convention.
Whom the party nominates for election is decided by all members equally and in secret. German party law requires it, and rightly so.
What it feels like
An example of what a conversation with the pension module could look like. The answers are made up.
Demo. The numbers are illustrations in the range of official projections, the measures are examples from the current reform debate. The pension module, its assumptions and the position are built after the convention, under the principles the convention sets. Nothing you type here is stored.
| Outdated Parties | Post-AI Party | |
|---|---|---|
| Program | A text, every four years | A computational model, checkable every day |
| Decisions | Gut feeling, polling, back rooms | Open-source model, checkable by anyone |
| Influence | Seniority and network | The quality of your predictions, measured live |
| Accountability | Whoever was wrong gets promoted anyway | Every prediction is online with name and result |
| Horizon | The next election | Continuous, up to 30 years |
| Finances | An accountability report, a year later | Open books, live |
| Reach | Regional branches | One method, every country in Europe |
Open
Models, assumptions, predictions and results sit versioned in one place. Whoever wants to clones it and runs the numbers themselves.
AI
What happens to my pension if we change this? Anyone can ask. Submitting an idea takes a minute, and you get an answer with reasons.
Europe
We start in Germany. The structure is built so it runs in every country in Europe with its own data and its own models.
The 100 · Born to build
In the summer of 1787, 55 people sat in Philadelphia and wrote not laws, but the rules by which laws are made. Their work laid the foundation for 250 years of prosperity growth on a scale never seen before. Now we need a new generation of European founding mothers & fathers. Four days in a hotel, and at the end it is settled how this party works: who may change the model, how we measure prediction quality, how that turns into voting weight, what is public. No model, no positions, only the principles and mechanisms. If you want to be there, apply. If you know someone who should be, tell us who.
Economists, engineers, visionaries. People who know from experience that incentives beat good intentions.
Contrarians, auditors, forecasters, skeptics. People who see how a system gets gamed before anyone does it.
Doers, founders, CEOs, investors, journalists, scientists with an audience. People a country listens to.
What comes next
